Can The Drucker Forum Establish The Human Dimension Of Management?
Steve Denning

guestPosted by

In November 2018, the world’s leading management conference—the Global Peter Drucker Forum—will debate a profound question: “management—the human dimension.” A cast of eminent thinkers and executives will consider nothing less than the possibility of “a business reformation”— something analogous to Martin Luther’s call of 1517 for the Roman Catholic Church to abandon the sale of indulgences.

The Drucker Forum invites us “to rethink how organizations, businesses, are actually run, why they are run, and what their purpose and role are in society.”

The Three Responsibilities of Management

In responding to this call, a good starting point is Peter Drucker’s 1954 classic book, Management, which formulated three responsibilities of management:

  • assuring the performance of the institution for which managers work,
  • making work productive and the worker achieving, and
  • managing social impacts and social responsibilities.

“Management,” wrote Drucker, “is what tradition used to call a liberal art… Managers draw on all the knowledge and insights of the humanities and the social sciences… But they have to focus this knowledge on effectiveness and results.”

1.    The Organization’s Performance

The most important of management’s responsibilities, said Drucker, is assuring the performance of the institution for which managers work. This is where the human aspect of management has been most seriously sacrificed to the financial.

Drucker repeatedly insisted that “there is only one valid purpose of a corporation, to create a customer.” In Management (1954), Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1973) and Innovation and Entrepreneurship (1985) Drucker set aside any flabby platitudes about satisfying all stakeholders or pursuing some preachy purpose with a capital “P”.

Yet beginning in the late 20th Century, many public corporations espoused the opposite goal—maximizing shareholder value as reflected in the stock price, a notion that even Jack Welch has called “the dumbest idea in the world.” In pursuing profit ahead of people, public corporations succeeded in massively destroying long-term profit and shareholder value.

Today, the fast-changing marketplace has underlined the validity of Drucker’s dictum. As a result, some firms have reinstated human beings—customers—as the central focus of the firm. Paradoxically—and happily—this shift in focus from money to people has also ended up in making a great deal more money for the company and its shareholders. The five largest firms on the planet (by market capitalization)—Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google Microsoft— have succeeded precisely because they have created more customers than any other firms.

2.    Making Work Productive

“The second task of management,” Drucker said, “is to make work productive and the worker achieving.” In the 20th Century, people doing work were treated as “human resources” i.e. things to be mined. Towards the end of the century, work and workers were often no more than collateral damage in the rush to maximize shareholder value. Gains in productivity were skimmed off the top for shareholders, including the firms’ executives.

As firms became steadily less productive in real terms, as documented by Deloitte’s Center for the Edge, only a resort to financial engineering, share buybacks, acquisitions offshoring, kept up a pretense of Potemkin prosperity. Meanwhile the rich got richer while median salaries stagnated.

This dynamic is now also changing dramatically. As firms find that their future increasingly depends on a capability to meet customer demands through continuous innovation, this means winning the battle for scarce top talent.

Acquiring, nurturing, rewarding and retaining top talent becomes necessary for success. Generating stimulating, meaningful workplaces becomes a central management preoccupation. Here again, the human dimension is already emerging triumphant in top firms in the private sector, even as the overall education system, including business schools, lag woefully behind in generating the competencies required.

3.    Managing Social Impacts And Social Responsibilities

“The third task of management,” Drucker taught us, “is managing the “two different types of social impact…

  • Those negative ones that an organization creates and
  • Social ills that may be converted to business opportunities.”

This is an area to which the new digital giants urgently need to pay more attention. For instance, the alleged misuse of Facebook’s private data, Google’s alleged use of its market power to suppress competition, and Uber’s breaches of local regulations, are serious issues. If the firms themselves don’t rectify any transgressions that have occurred, regulators must step in.

Maintaining Balance

Yet balance is also key. In managing negative social impact, regulators—and the Drucker Forum—must avoid throwing out the baby with the bathwater. They need to recognize that the new digital giants have gotten so large so fast because they have met real social and economic needs that vast numbers of people see as important. The challenge is to manage any negative social impacts while recognizing the real value that these firms are creating for real human beings.

Steve Denning’s latest book is The Age of Agile (2018).

This article first appeared in at and is reproduced here in a condensed form with permission, all rights reserved.

This article is one in a series related to the 10th Global Peter Drucker Forum, with the theme management. the human dimension, taking place on November 29 & 30, 2018 in Vienna, Austria #GPDF18

This article was also published on Linkedin.

Photo by: Mihai/

One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *