When leaders talk about innovation, they usually talk about talent, technology, and speed.
They look for creative people, better tools, faster decisions, and stronger execution. They invest in AI, digital platforms, new ventures, and redesign efforts. All of that matters.
But one question usually remains underexamined: what kind of organization makes ingenuity usable?[…]
Every organization now wants more ingenuity.
Boards ask for it. Leaders invoke it. Strategy decks celebrate it. AI is expected to accelerate it. In a world shaped by volatility, technological upheaval, and competitive pressure, ingenuity has become the human resource everyone suddenly wants more of. […]
In Blog 1, we described the unmanaged state of management with the default mode of “muddling through” that so many organizations find themselves trapped in. In Blog 2, we unpacked the nine features that define mastery in management from diagnostic to interactive and from human to regenerative.
Now the question becomes: How do we get there?
How do we move from where we are to where we want to be without getting lost, stuck, or overwhelmed?[…]
In our first blog, we talked about the unmanaged state which describes how many organizations today are stuck in a cycle of “muddling through,” led by outdated management models and well-meaning but overwhelmed leaders. We made the case for better management, not more control but more clarity and capability.
Now let’s zoom in on what better management actually looks like.[…]
![[…]](https://www.druckerforum.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/Michel_Nold_Bosbach_1_600x315px.jpg)
Much of leadership today feels like guessing in the dark. We dress it up with overused buzzwords, dashboards, and KPIs—but behind the curtain, many organizations are still “muddling through” using management techniques developed in the industrial 20th century. Decisions are reactive rather than proactive. Strategies are stuck in the past. And leaders? Too often, executives become overwhelmed by firefighting instead of shaping the future. More often than not, they chase the next big thing—currently AI—instead of simply managing better.
Continue reading
While over 95% of organizations report that they conduct annual reviews with their employees (Willmes, 2018), there is growing concern about the usefulness of ‘such bureaucratic rituals’ in a world where new knowledge is the primary driver of value creation through innovation. We use the term ‘contribution dialogue’ to represent a replacement process. Others use terms like leadership dialogue, employee review, target setting and review, feedback meeting, performance dialogue and others to explain similar processes. […]
Continue reading
You know the situation. You have seemingly done nothing different, but suddenly notice that your leadership is less effective, your culture signals infections, and your management system keeps you busy rather than serving your business. It is very likely that these are the early symptoms of a systemic crisis that is about to hit your organization. That crisis is a natural part of your growth cycle.[…]
Continue reading
Let’s think of management as the art, science, and craft to get work done. As most of us perform some kind of work, and most work requires more than one individual to complete, we need to care about management. It touches everyone, everywhere, anytime.[…]
Continue reading