Why does it seem that the big corporations always get away with it? How do they sleep at night, given some of the missteps causing such problems to the rest of us?<\/span><\/p>\n Not our problem<\/b><\/p>\n It seems like it\u2019s no-one\u2019s problem, always somewhere to pass it up\/along\/down the line so there\u2019s no individual responsibility. Hence no action until a customer gets a real problem. The latest example is BMW\u2019s delay in making a product recall on some of its cars, although knowing the electrical system could completely fail at any time. Someone has now <\/span>died,<\/span><\/a> and while the problem was identified by BMW (and the UK\u2019s Driver and Vehicle Safety Agency) no-one took action. Reports were written and filed. Job descriptions met. Evaluations no doubt passed. Yet, a man died.<\/span><\/p>\n Avoid loss by not caring<\/b><\/p>\n A large company has many degrees of separation between management and stakeholders. People at the top don\u2019t know many of their own team, let alone external stakeholders, so it is easy to treat them (us) as mere numbers to be shifted about for the apparent greater good. And it\u2019s easy to hide \u2013 which is a human trait. Why take responsibility if you don\u2019t have to? Which means that if you, as a business, don\u2019t have to take responsibility for all the mistakes, you don\u2019t suffer so many losses. Avoiding loss is usually a better way to grow than taking on new, possibly risky projects. Indeed, what is a risky project, if you can avoid potentials losses? Hence more growth, with a tendency to blur the lines between accountability and morality. <\/span><\/p>\n The relentless drive towards what is perceived as shareholder value means that failure is not countenanced. Risk reduction and profits at someone else\u2019s cost is often tacitly accepted.<\/span><\/p>\n Are smaller companies more accountable?<\/b><\/p>\n Smaller companies are probably more accountable, \u00a0as owners and managers are closer to their team and stakeholders. Nowhere to hide! Fewer external forces driving their need for continual growth. There\u2019s more sense of community. Just like the communities that sprang up around the coal fields and steel works \u2013 everyone knew and looked out for everyone else. Peer pressure produced a collective moral compass. So it is in small companies. People know each other, their families and even friends.<\/span><\/p>\n Many small business owners value that closeness to team and stakeholders and decide not to grow because they think the business might grow too big and lose that sense of identity. They also wonder if they can manage a larger entity. Perhaps it is the growing size and complexity that worries them, but also anecdotally they are concerned what the extra layers might bring in terms of lost accountability. Subconsciously, they see what some of the the big businesses get away with and it doesn\u2019t sit easily with them. They prefer having nowhere to hide. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Act like the big guys<\/b><\/p>\n Some small businesses try to emulate their larger cousins, copying structure, organisation and methods. Some business owners, it must be said, are entirely comfortable with making as much as possible with little regard for the consequences. Over time, this attitude tends to mellow. Whether that reflects experiences \u2013 a few reverses that teach the owner to be more careful \u2013 or if it is a sign of growing maturity, we don\u2019t know. Yet businesses we have worked with for many years often exhibit this sort of change. Part of growing is growing up.<\/span><\/p>\n Should not the first rule of business be to embrace one of the parts of the Hippocratic Oath \u2013 <\/span>primum non nocere<\/span><\/i> (first, do no harm). Bigger business should have done their growing up, but given the current state of internal self-regulation, physician, heal thyself seems all too apposite for many organisations.<\/span><\/p>\n How to grow <\/b>and<\/i><\/b> sleep at night<\/b><\/p>\n Is there a way of growing, yet keeping the moral sense and community nature of the entity? I am reminded of an address by Vineet Nayar, CEO of HCL Technologies (employer of 90,000 people) at the 2014 Drucker Forum. It\u2019s all <\/span>here<\/span><\/a> (and he will speak again \u00a0at the <\/span>2018 Global Peter Drucker Forum<\/span><\/a>). In it, he describes how he gets back the sense of pride and individual ownership by putting employees first, and customers second. His goal was for his people to introduce themselves as a proud member of HCL instead of simply saying, \u201cI work in IT\u201d. HCL\u2019s management team has the primary job of enthusing the people, by providing a compelling vision of tomorrow for each one of them. As ever, it relies on personal objectives, not corporate ones. Asking for opinions, and having the humility to take criticism in the right spirit. \u00a0Democratising, so that policies and direction are agreed with everyone, has for HCL ensured spectacular growth and a happier environment.<\/span><\/p>\n It really works<\/b><\/p>\n Growth seems more achievable when you find a way of engaging your people. We have seen some interesting growth trajectories \u2013 businesses that have embraced this approach have grown turnover eightfold in seven years, with a profits increase to match, and even bigger growth in net assets. Still with a sense of fairness and balance, caused by the community spirit that remains, even after such stellar results. Just like HCL.<\/span><\/p>\n About the author:<\/strong><\/p>\n Nick Hixson is a business enabler and accountant, helping small and medium size business in strategy, leadership, management and team engagement. He also moderates the Drucker blog series.<\/p>\n This article is one in a series related to the <\/i><\/b>10th Global Peter Drucker Forum<\/i><\/b><\/a>, with the theme <\/i><\/b>management. the human dimension<\/i><\/b><\/a>, taking place on November 29 & 30, 2018 in Vienna, Austria #GPDF18<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n